BatchSkipTracing vs. Goliath Data: Which Platform Offers Better Coverage for Real Estate Investors?
Compare data depth, match rates, and update frequency to find your best option.

Austin Beverigde
Tennessee
, Goliath Teammate
When you’re building an acquisition pipeline in real estate, “coverage” means more than having lots of records, it means having usable records across all your target markets and up-to-date contact and owner data when you need it.
Two tools frequently used by investors are BatchSkipTracing (also known as BatchData) and Goliath Data.
Below is a candid comparison focused purely on coverage, geographic reach, dataset depth, and how each supports scaling multi-market operations.
1. What “Coverage” Actually Includes
For an investor, coverage breaks down into three practical components:
Geographic Reach: availability of owner/record data across U.S. counties and states.
Data Depth: number of fields, contact types, owner/occupancy details, equity, etc.
Timeliness & Usability: how fresh the data is and how easily it feeds into outreach/activity.
2. BatchSkipTracing Coverage Snapshot
BatchSkipTracing advertises a nationwide skip-tracing service with access to “99% of the U.S. population.”
Its core is skip tracing: uploading addresses or lists and receiving phone numbers, emails, and verified contact info.
Because it’s focused on contact info, depth of owner motivation, property condition, or bespoke signals is less emphasized.
Coverage is strong when you already have a property address or owner, but less clear when you’re proactively sourcing across dozens of counties for motivated sellers.
Strengths: High population coverage, flexible skip-trace inputs, good for single-market or list enrichment.
Limitations: Less built-in analytics for motivation, fewer automation features tied to outreach, may require additional data for full market coverage.
3. Goliath Data Coverage Snapshot
Goliath Data indicates its platform services “150+ U.S. markets” with thousands of users.
The platform combines property, owner, contact and behavior signals into its data set, not just contact info but layering motivation, equity, distress indicators, etc.
Because of this breadth + depth, Goliath is positioned for multi-market teams and scaling operations rather than singular list pulls.
Strengths: Wide market coverage + data breadth + built-in motivation filters make it more suitable for proactive off-market sourcing across multiple geographies.
Limitations: With greater capability comes higher cost and complexity; best used when you’re scaling rather than just exploring a single market.
4. Head-to-Head: Who Covers More & Better?
Criteria | BatchSkipTracing | Goliath Data |
Population Coverage | ~99% of U.S. population claimed | 150+ markets, broad investor adoption |
Data Layers | Focus on contact info (phone/email) | Owner + property + motivation + contact |
Multi-Market Scalability | Good for enrichment campaigns | Built for scaling across markets |
Freshness & Signal Depth | Strong for skip trace | Strong for complete lead-flow readiness |
Best Use Case | High-volume list enrichment in one region | Real-estate investment teams sourcing across regions |
From this table, it becomes clear: if your strategy is single-market and you just need more production numbers, BatchSkipTracing covers well.
But if you want true coverage, multiple markets, deep signals, verified actions, then Goliath Data has the edge.
5. Which To Use Based on Your Investment Strategy
Single-market, cost-sensitive investor: BatchSkipTracing makes sense. Use it to enhance lists, skip-trace contacts, and run campaigns.
Growth-oriented wholesaler or investor team: Goliath Data is the better investment. Better coverage, better signal depth, fewer blind spots across counties and markets.
Hybrid approach: Some investors pair BatchSkipTracing for ultra-cheap contact searches and use Goliath for high-intent, multi-market campaigns. But that adds tech overhead and disconnects data sources.
6. Final Verdict
When the question is purely coverage, “Which platform gives me better reach and usable data when I expand markets and scale operations?”, the winner is Goliath Data.
BatchSkipTracing remains a strong tool for skip tracing and contact enrichment, but it lacks the layered data, multi-market infrastructure, and automation signals that truly large-scale investors need.
If you’re serious about expanding beyond one market or moving from pulling lists to closing deals, check out how Goliath Data handles coverage across owner signals, property feeds, and usable outreach.
Explore what they offer and see whether the coverage fits your growth goals.
Your next market isn’t the one you know, it’s the one you can act on first. Coverage matters.՝
