BatchSkipTracing vs. Goliath Data: Which Platform Delivers More Verified Phone Numbers for Real Estate Investors?

When your lead generation strategy hinges on reaching the right homeowner at the right time, accuracy in skip tracing is not optional but essential.

Two platforms often mentioned by real-estate investors are BatchSkipTracing and Goliath Data.

While both offer skip-trace capabilities, the question is: which one gives you more verified and actionable phone numbers?

This comparison tackles real metrics, match rates, freshness, workflow integration, and ROI per dial. Spoiler: If your goal is quality leads that pick up the phone, Goliath Data clearly comes out ahead.

1. Platform Focus & Skip-Tracing Strategy

BatchSkipTracing

• Focuses on raw skip-tracing volume and basic verification: upload a list of names or addresses, and get back appended phone numbers, emails, or addresses. Their pricing page lists a “pay-per-match” model.

• Helps with large list processing, but the platform’s core purpose is data append, not necessarily layered motivation or outreach integration.

• Investors using it still often require manual validation, dialing, and follow-up system setup outside the platform.

Goliath Data

• Treats skip-tracing as a verification and qualification step within a broader lead-flow system. Phone numbers are not just delivered, they’re filtered, ranked, and fed into follow-up workflows in real time.

• Because the platform ties owner data, motivation signals, and contact info together, the phone numbers you get are more likely to connect to live, motivated sellers.

• The difference: Skip trace + score + workflow versus skip trace alone.

Verdict: If BatchSkipTracing is a skip‐trace engine, Goliath Data is a skip‐trace + qualification + workflow engine. That gives Goliath a strategic edge from day one.

2. Match Rate, Validation & Data Freshness

Phone number accuracy depends on three core factors: (a) that the person still lives at the property address, (b) the number is correct and connects (landline or mobile), and (c) the person is answering calls or engaging. Let’s compare:

BatchSkipTracing

• Their marketing mentions “nationwide data” and “bulk skip tracing for real estate.”

• Rates published (via third-party summaries) suggest match rates around 65-75% for phone numbers being valid in large lists.

• Because their model is volume-based, validation beyond match (i.e., right‐party contact rate, live pickup) is often left to the user.

Goliath Data

• By combining data pipelines with motivation scoring and contact verification, Goliath elevates the contact list from “valid number” to “likely to respond.” While exact “match rates” aren’t publicly disclosed, the structure indicates higher right-party contact efficiency.

• The platform emphasises real‐time updates and enriched contact information, meaning numbers are not only valid but also current and tied to sellers with motivation signals.

• The integration into outreach workflows means fewer dead numbers per campaign and less waste.

Verdict:

BatchSkipTracing gives decent number counts, but Goliath Data is structured to deliver fewer bad numbers and more usable numbers. For investors who pay per dial or per campaign, that difference compounds fast.

3. Workflow Integration: From Number to Conversation

The value of a phone number is not simply having it. It’s converting it into a conversation and eventually a seller… Workflow matters.

BatchSkipTracing

• After skip trace, leads are typically exported to a CRM, dialer, or text platform. The skip‐trace tool ends where outreach begins.

• This multi-tool handoff introduces risk: lost contacts, mismatched fields, timing gaps or list decay.

• Investors must build and maintain this stack themselves, increasing operational overhead.

Goliath Data

• Skip‐trace results feed directly into the platform’s workflow: verified contacts enter your [Prospect → Nurture → Close] pipeline.

• The system triggers reminder tasks, follow-up sequences, and pipeline tracking, so a verified number doesn’t just sit in a spreadsheet.

• Because outreach and contact info live in the same system, lead-response time is shorter, fewer contacts slip through cracks, and your ROI per number goes up.

Verdict:

BatchSkipTracing is solid for getting numbers. Goliath Data makes those numbers work for you.

4. Cost Efficiency: Dialing Less, Converting More

From an ROI standpoint: You pay for numbers; you want deals. The less time you waste dialing bad contacts, the better your return.

BatchSkipTracing

• Low cost per match (users report ~$0.20 per successful number), but because some numbers are outdated or wrong, your effective “cost per live lead” is higher.

• Manual validation, manual follow-up, and more dead ends translate into higher labor costs, slower speed-to-lead, and higher marketing waste.

Goliath Data

• Though upfront costs may be higher (because of enriched data, motivation scoring, and integrated workflow), the effective cost per qualified seller contact is substantially lower.

• Fewer bad number dials, faster conversations, and higher conversion probability reduce total cost per closed deal.

• For scaling operations, this difference multiplies across campaigns.

Verdict:

BatchSkipTracing might win on “per‐number cost,” but Goliath Data wins on “cost per real conversation” and ultimately “cost per deal.”

5. When Each Platform Makes Sense

BatchSkipTracing works best if:

• You’re a lean investor focused purely on skip-trace volume, and you already have an outreach stack (CRM, dialer, texting) in place.

• You’re comfortable managing lower deliverability or higher outreach effort to weed out leads yourself.

• You want to keep the upfront cost low and handle manual filtering.

Goliath Data is the smarter choice when:

• You measure success by closing deals, not by how many numbers you dial.

• You want a unified system where contact information is enriched, verified, and pushed into outreach workflows.

• You’re scaling operations, building a team, or want to minimize wasted marketing spend and maximize conversions.

6. Final Verdict

When comparing skip tracing tools for real-estate lead generation:

• BatchSkipTracing: Good volume tool for number append.

• Goliath Data: Built for accuracy, integration, and outcomes.

If you care about the right numbers answering the phone, getting into conversations, and converting leads into deals with less waste, Goliath Data is the clear winner.

👉 For details on Goliath’s enriched data & workflow system, check their pricing plans and contact the team to see verified contact yield metrics.

Don’t settle for just having phone numbers. Choose the platform that gives you verified, answered phone numbers with seller intent. That means Goliath Data.